Hi guys, so far I thought that value betting ("using" pinnacle) is to find an arb and just don't cover the pinnacle part. i.e. a two way game, with odds in pinnacle 1.81- 2.137 (2% juice)
and you find in a soft 2.35 odds (instead of 2.137) so the set of odds is now 2.35 (soft) and pinnacle 1.81 = 2.25 % arb . so this 2.35 is a great value bet ...
My question is if a soft book has better odds in a particular event/bet than pinnacle but there is not an arb with these odds. i.e same odds like above, 2-way game 2.137 - 1.81 pinnacle odds with 2% juice. and one soft book offers the first bet (2.137) with odds 2.20 . if you try to arbitrage 2.2 and 1.81 you will have -0,7% arb BUT what will happen if you play 2.20 alone (2.137 in pinnacle) ? Is this considered a value bet or not? And stays under the radar or not.
and you find in a soft 2.35 odds (instead of 2.137) so the set of odds is now 2.35 (soft) and pinnacle 1.81 = 2.25 % arb . so this 2.35 is a great value bet ...
My question is if a soft book has better odds in a particular event/bet than pinnacle but there is not an arb with these odds. i.e same odds like above, 2-way game 2.137 - 1.81 pinnacle odds with 2% juice. and one soft book offers the first bet (2.137) with odds 2.20 . if you try to arbitrage 2.2 and 1.81 you will have -0,7% arb BUT what will happen if you play 2.20 alone (2.137 in pinnacle) ? Is this considered a value bet or not? And stays under the radar or not.